Collect data and decide how teaching could be changed
In engaging with Step 2 of the action research cycle—collecting data and reflecting on how teaching could be adapted—I plan to review the intervention outline I submitted for the IP unit and incorporate the feedback received into my ongoing development.
I have already taken steps to engage with students directly, using surveys to gather insights into their experiences (available here). This data has been important in shaping my understanding of initial students’ needs and their perspectives on inclusivity in the classroom thinking broadly about their learning experience. Additionally, I have collected observational data during class sessions and peer review exercises, using these as insights for how the intervention could evolve.
Then, some new themes have emerged from discussions with tutors and peers in my PGCert course. These conversations have highlighted the importance of incorporating a focus group that includes colleagues, in addition to students, to gain a broader understanding of the dynamics at play. I have since run a focus group and gathered data, which has provided valuable insights. Evidence of this can be found in the following blog post, which reflects on my process and findings: Case Study: Planning and Teaching for Effective Learning.
The next steps would be to work on the Ethical Action Plan form to better understand the intervention in more detail, assess its impact on all participants, and determine what I need to read and prepare. This will involve rethinking and framing the research questions, as well as opening a dialogue regarding its implementation and methodology.